A famous parable suggests that it is appropriate to save the best for last. In my opinion, this was a wise decision, as now the foundations for deigning opportunities to learn with technology have been laid. Now we are being treated to a plethora of technological innovations which have the power to
transend communication. We see in Web 2.0 the ability to mediate the sort of communications which are present outside of the digital
rehlm.
Spicifically,
blogs, social bookmarks, and
wikis.
iGoogle is a nifty gadget. I was able to
customomize a home page, which has the look and feel of the Mac desktop with gadgets visible. My home page is populated with "Art of the Day," a "Calendar," "Date & Time," "Weather," and "News Headlines." A second tab on my
iGoogle site is my Google Reader.
Words crafted into thoughts/ideas can be searched by
web crawlers, spiders, and human created
indexes, and the compilations of these thoughts can be served up to your computer in a variety of means. We needn't be
bombarded with sexy graphics luring us to the content (although this might come along with the content) so that we will click on it, it simply comes to us. In terms of efficiency, this seems to me to be an extremely efficient paradigm. Some of us might be ill-
equipped to avail ourselves of this efficiency.
In a previous course, a group of colleagues and I looked at the "digital divide" from a number of
perspectives. As we explore Web 2.0, my thinking is shifting to a new definition of the "digital divide," as one in which some individuals will adapt to comprehending reality in a virtual space and time brought about by technological advancements, and others will not.
A doctoral student in our cohort expressed in her blog a concern for the needs of special education students. Her concern rings true in this new "time-space"
continuum, particularly with students with spatial disabilities. (This might be an interesting topic for a dissertation??).